A summary of the results of the 2016 IPIN competition is available. The following pictures depict the details, which can be downloaded in their complete form for track 1 and track 3 (spreadsheet, maps).


Track 1: Smartphone based positioning (on-site)

NAVINDOOR - Best Result 

Median 3.8
Mean 4.5
RMS 2.9
3rd quartile 5.4
1

1


SAMSUNG - Best Result

Median 6.2
Mean 7.0
RMS 4.6
3rd quartile 8.2
1

1


WIMAG - Best Result

Median 11.4
Mean 13.7
RMS 9.7
3rd quartile 18.7
1

1


WMLOC - Best Result

Median 28.4
Mean 29.3
RMS 11.9
3rd quartile 36.0
1

1


XMUH - Best Result

Median 39.2
Mean 33.4
RMS 18.3
3rd quartile 47.4
1

1


XPOSITION - Best Result

Median 29.2
Mean 33.3
RMS 21.0
3rd quartile 49.8
1

1


Track 2: Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (on-site)

SYSNAV - Best Result 

3rd Quartile : 11.19 m, 26.19m (with floor penalty)
Mean : 17.20 m
Median : 7.03 m
Std : 23.65 m
RPE : 122.24 m
Travelled distance : 1344.98 m

1

1


NESL - Best Result 
3rd Quartile : 1.50 m
Mean : 1.35 m
Median : 1.10 m
Std : 0.91 m
RPE : 1.42 m
Travelled distance : 1023.6m

1

1


XIAMEN UNIV. - Best Result 

 

All key points are recorded, but floor identification was not done for floors 2 ~ 4.
3rd Quartile : 54.79m, 83.36m(with floor penalty)
Mean : 48.79m
Median : 48.6m
Std : 10.2 m
RPE : 61.01 m
Travelled distance : 532.27 m

1


1


Univ. Deusto - Best Result 

 

3rd Quartile : 67.97 m
Mean : 60.13 m
Median : 59.88 m
Std : 18.93 m
RPE : 126.78 m
Travelled distance : 962.33 m

1


1


Univ. Parma - Best Result 

 

3rd Quartile : 41.11 m
Mean : 30.73 m
Median : 29.03 m
Std : 12.92 m
RPE : 20.78 m
Travelled distance : 812.29 m

1


1


Tanjin Univ. Best Result 

 

This trial is incomplete, so the result will not be considered as an official record.
3rd Quartile : 127.28 m
Mean : 62.98 m
Median : 30.81 m
Std : 59.09 m
RPE : 71.63 m
Travelled distance : 532.27 m

1


1


Track 3: Smartphone-based Positioning (Off-site)

HFTS - Best Result

XY-Error Floor Rate
Logfile01 2.5 100.00%
Logfile02 3.51 89.01%
Logfile03 15.96 84.62%
Logfile04 2.03 100.00%
Logfile05 4.49 100.00%
Logfile06 1.73 100.00%
Logfile07 5.52 100.00%
Logfile08 11.41 88.10%
Logfile09 2.23 100.00%
3rd-Quartile 5.8m

hfts

 

UMinho - Best Result

XY-Error Floor Rate
Logfile01 3.71 97.83%
Logfile02 3.3 80.22%
Logfile03 12.04 100.00%
Logfile04 4.32 100.00%
Logfile05 4.7 97.62%
Logfile06 5.76 100.00%
Logfile07 4.45 100.00%
Logfile08 10.45 100.00%
Logfile09 5.5 100.00%
3rd-Quartile 7.3m

minho

 

BlockDox - Best Result

XY-Error Floor Rate
Logfile01 3.2 78.26%
Logfile02 3.8 87.91%
Logfile03 13.26 87.69%
Logfile04 3.66 100.00%
Logfile05 5.9 90.48%
Logfile06 4.51 100.00%
Logfile07 6.2 92.31%
Logfile08 9.49 90.48%
Logfile09 5.17 100.00%
3rd-Quartile 7.8m

hfts

 

FHWS - Best Result

XY-Error Floor Rate
Logfile01 5.02 93.48%
Logfile02 4.5 78.02%
Logfile03 16.74 100.00%
Logfile04 5.94 100.00%
Logfile05 8.18 100.00%
Logfile06 4.23 100.00%
Logfile07 6.32 100.00%
Logfile08 19.73 100.00%
Logfile09 4.39 100.00%
3rd-Quartile 8.8m

hfts

 

Marauder's - Best Result

XY-Error Floor Rate
Logfile01 24.77 39.13%
Logfile02 12.51 32.97%
Logfile03 31.17 18.46%
Logfile04 27.82 42.67%
Logfile05 16.18 35.71%
Logfile06 23.97 100.00%
Logfile07 46.3 26.15%
Logfile08 16.59 50.00%
Logfile09 26.7 100.00%
3rd-Quartile 40.9m

Track 4: Robot Based Positioning

ATLAS - Best Result

3rd-Quartile: 106mm

Mean error: 80.12mm

cdf_atlas

trayectoria_atlas

TOPO-rtls - Best Result

3rd-Quartile: 311mm

Mean error: 220.48mm

cdf_toportls
trayectoria_toportls
 
Joomla SEO powered by JoomSEF